2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27
The rankings are figured using seven overall team statistical categories. If teams are tied statistically in any category, they will be given the same rank for that category.
Week Ending October 31st, 2010
Pos | Team | Avg Rank | GPG | SFPG | PPPCT | PKPCT | SAPG | Save % | GAA |
1. | Waterloo (4-2-1) | 4.3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
2. | Green Bay (6-2-1) | 5.0 | 11 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
3. | Indiana (4-3-1) | 5.1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 5 |
4. | Cedar Rapids (6-1-0) | 5.3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
5T. | Sioux City (6-3-0) | 7.6 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
5T. | Sioux Falls (6-2-0) | 7.6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
7. | Dubuque (5-3-1) | 8.4 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
8. | Omaha (3-3-1) | 8.7 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
9T. | Des Moines (3-1-2) | 9.4 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
9T. | Fargo (5-4-1) | 9.4 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 14 | 8 |
9T. | Tri-City (3-2-4) | 9.4 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 10 |
12T. | Chicago (5-4-1) | 10.0 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 2 | 3 |
12T. | USNTDP U18/U17 (3-6-1) | 10.0 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 8 | 14 |
14. | Lincoln (2-5-0) | 10.6 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
15. | Youngstown (4-5-1) | 11.0 | 14 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
16. | Muskegon (2-4-2) | 13.1 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 16 |
GPG: Goals per game; SFPG: Shots for per game; PPPCT: Power play percentage; PKPCT: Power kill percentage; SAPG: Shots allowed per game; Save %: Save percentage; GAA: Goals against average